No fighting in the war room
Tuesday, 9 November 2010
Five Reasons To watch Trailer Park Boys
1:Bubbles
In many ways Bubbles is the heart of Sunnyvale. By far the most intelligent and observant of the shows ensemble cast of characters
Bubbles is the glue holding the trailer park troupe together.
A kind, loyal and protective friend, Bubbles motives are almost always selfless. He also has a love of 'kitties'.
Over the course of the series Bubbles comes to realise that family are the people you surround yourself with, the ones with whom you share your life and is eventualy able to move past his childhood abandonment issues.
'Here's what I know, Rick. If you love something, let it go. If it comes back to you, you own it. If it doesn't, you don't own it. And if it doesn't you're an asshole, just like you.'
2: (officer) Jim Lahey
Jim lahey is Sunnyvales resident trailer park supervisor, who along with his assistant trailer park supervisor (and lover) Randy attempts to curb what he sees as 'The Boys' criminal influence over his beloved trailer park.
Lahey is the perfect anti hero, he is the joker to the boys Batman. He is an essential part of the shows dynamic. Without the boys Lahey is nothing and vice versa.This on going battle forms the shows core story line.
The range of situations which arise between Lahey and the boys are complex, moving between childish pranks, petty crime and even attempted murder to times of peace and cooperation between the supervisor and his unruly residents, although such times are short lived due to Lahey's recurring alcoholism.
'Who is this park, or even in the whole world, doesn't have problems? Who doesn't have a drink too many times once in a while and maybe even winds up passed out in their own driveway, pissing themselves? Who doesn't drink too much sometimes or who doesn't have a puff from time to time? And who doesn't have problems with the people they love? This is our home. This is our community.'
3: The Boys (Ricky and Julian)
Ricky and Julian are sunnyvales entreprenurial criminal duo,
The issue of stagnating Zombies.
I just watched the first episode of Frank Darabonts and AMC's 'The walking Dead'. As it stands it seems to be a good, gory show with a classic 'man seeks family' emotional centre.
Now i LOVE zombies, i really do. I would put them ahead of the wolf-man and Dracula in the movie monster stakes, they may not have had their own set of commemorative stamps (yet) but they are none the less an important icon in horror history.
But since Zombies really hit the mainstream after the release of films like dawn of the dead (remake) and 28days later
(i personaly dont view them as zombies but as i am part of a pedantic minority i will include the film for the sake of argument)
the whole sub-genre has become stale....still cool, but stale.
Enough already with the protaganist who wakes from a coma to find a world devestated by a zombie plague, dispense with the search for loved ones and rumors of protected military bases and possible cures.
Yes, in the reality of a zombifying viral outbreak this may be the logical scenario so why not play it out over and over again in a fictionalised film universe, after all it works. An audience can relate, perhaps this is what they would do if this actualy occured. And the whole set up has been proved to be a money spinner for studios and independants alike.
But c'mon this is movie-land use some imagination, put a fresh spin on things, broaden the horizon and send our festering friends places they have never been before. Focus on the zombies, forget the humans who are by this time outnumbered by around 50,000 to 1.
I have had some ideas....
1: Zombie political/social drama- After zombies inherit the Earth, and gain total dominance over mankind they begin to evolve socialy.Diverging into various groups with their own political and religious agendas. A power struggle ensues, those who wish to stick with the old ways of pack hunting which got them where they are in the first place and those who look to the future, who see the dwindling supply of fresh meat looming and choose to aim for a more socialy complex zombie race who work together on a grand scale to build infostructure to support their growing numbers.....building a zombie economy based on the farming and trading of humans.
2: Zombie sci-fi - "space, the final frontier. These are the voyages of the starship decrepit.Its mission...to seek out new life and new civilisations, to boldly chew what no no zombie has chewed before."
3: Zombie family based sit-com - "Honey we're having the boss for dinner tonight, break out the good china..." (cue canned laughter)
Ok not so great, but at least i tried.
Dont get me wrong amongst the wave blandness there have been some standout films. Shaun of the dead being the obvious choice and my personal favourite Pontypool, an independant canadian pic about a zombie virus spread through use of the english language.
I just dont see why for every pontypool we need 5 itterations of Romeros 'dead films' or another 28days later clone.
Even if your film sucks in the end i will respect you for trying....just trying to break the mold, even just crack it slightly.
In the meantime though i will stay tuned to the walking dead and see what road darabont and co. ultimatley decide to take us down.
Now i LOVE zombies, i really do. I would put them ahead of the wolf-man and Dracula in the movie monster stakes, they may not have had their own set of commemorative stamps (yet) but they are none the less an important icon in horror history.
But since Zombies really hit the mainstream after the release of films like dawn of the dead (remake) and 28days later
(i personaly dont view them as zombies but as i am part of a pedantic minority i will include the film for the sake of argument)
the whole sub-genre has become stale....still cool, but stale.
Enough already with the protaganist who wakes from a coma to find a world devestated by a zombie plague, dispense with the search for loved ones and rumors of protected military bases and possible cures.
Yes, in the reality of a zombifying viral outbreak this may be the logical scenario so why not play it out over and over again in a fictionalised film universe, after all it works. An audience can relate, perhaps this is what they would do if this actualy occured. And the whole set up has been proved to be a money spinner for studios and independants alike.
But c'mon this is movie-land use some imagination, put a fresh spin on things, broaden the horizon and send our festering friends places they have never been before. Focus on the zombies, forget the humans who are by this time outnumbered by around 50,000 to 1.
I have had some ideas....
1: Zombie political/social drama- After zombies inherit the Earth, and gain total dominance over mankind they begin to evolve socialy.Diverging into various groups with their own political and religious agendas. A power struggle ensues, those who wish to stick with the old ways of pack hunting which got them where they are in the first place and those who look to the future, who see the dwindling supply of fresh meat looming and choose to aim for a more socialy complex zombie race who work together on a grand scale to build infostructure to support their growing numbers.....building a zombie economy based on the farming and trading of humans.
2: Zombie sci-fi - "space, the final frontier. These are the voyages of the starship decrepit.Its mission...to seek out new life and new civilisations, to boldly chew what no no zombie has chewed before."
3: Zombie family based sit-com - "Honey we're having the boss for dinner tonight, break out the good china..." (cue canned laughter)
Ok not so great, but at least i tried.
Dont get me wrong amongst the wave blandness there have been some standout films. Shaun of the dead being the obvious choice and my personal favourite Pontypool, an independant canadian pic about a zombie virus spread through use of the english language.
I just dont see why for every pontypool we need 5 itterations of Romeros 'dead films' or another 28days later clone.
Even if your film sucks in the end i will respect you for trying....just trying to break the mold, even just crack it slightly.
In the meantime though i will stay tuned to the walking dead and see what road darabont and co. ultimatley decide to take us down.
Super Mario Brothers The Movie: A Defence
For any one old enough to remember the golden age of Nintendo, you will no doubt recall the popularity of a certain overweight plumber (with possible mafioso connections?) and his oft overlooked sibling.
Of course i am talking about super mario. It was at the height of the games popularity in the west that we were treated to (and i mean that sincerley) Super Mario Bros the Movie.
Now, if you were to ask someone who was there in the early 90's their thoughts on the plumbers transition to big screen you in all likelihood would be faced with bitter recolections of one of the most misjudged cash in's in the history of game to screen adaptations.This is a film which most believe to have caused so much damage that it put a stop to the idea that there would ever be a decent video game adaptation, and it often appears on 'worst films' lists.
Even Bob Hoskins says it is the biggest mistake of his career.
But i am here to say no, this is not the case.
I still remember the trip to the cinema, it was my cousins birthday. I remember the excitement, this was MARIO! I loved the film then and i love it even more now, heres why.
The look: Criticised as being much darker then its gaming origins, the majority of the film takes place in a beautifuly realised dystopian 'dinopolis' where reptiles have continued to evolve.
We are presented not with the cutsey cartoon world of the various games but with a bladerunner like noirish future. The art direction is fantastic, the city feels alive, it feels organic, from the first time the camera pans over this city scape i am sold, this is real, i can almost smell the fungus....
The Story: Another complaint directed at the film was that it bore little resemblance to the rest of the franchise. I say good. Take a look at the various videogames, as good as they are do you really want that garish cartoon pallet on the screen? Do you really want to see a mario who is heading down the path to 50 chasing around a young girl at least half his age? No of course not, that would be wrong.
And so the filmakers crafted a sci-fi plot involving meteors and paralel dimensions, which at least brought a level of fantastical believability to the consept of a fat catchphrase spouting plumber who saves the world from a giant lizard.
And you know what, it works well, its something new, interesting but it still manages to weave in countless references to the games within the enviroment.
I do not believe the people involved wanted to step all over what had come before. Only that they wanted to try a new approach, to find a new way of bringing the franchise to a wider audience.
Everything Else: All the players are great, Dennis Hopper as Koopa is an inspired piece of casting and Hoskins and liguizamo work well together.
The action is solid, the special effects fantatstic for its time and the script is oftenwitty ("Fascist,opressor of the proletariat!"...."guy in charge")
Cult film?: Most certainly yes, Mark kermode recently said that what defines a cult film is the fact that it was concieved as being a major hit, that the filmakers wanted to create something spectacular but for whatever reason the resulting film did not live up to expectation but overtime built up a small following of loyal fans, and that by concieving something as a cult film (such as the recent pirahna 3d) you are contradicting the very idea of cult, and there-fore can never be cult.
If this is to be believed then SMBTM is the epitome of a cult classic.
As a videogame adaptation: One of the best, granted its not a hard list to top but i just do not understand how people can honestly say this is the worst example in a world where you can buy jcvd's street fighter or Paul w.s andersons mortal kombat/resident evil films. Compared to these this is fucking le dolche vita!
Go back, watch it again. Im telling you even if you dont love it, its a good solid action/adventure sci fi film which i am always happy to watch.
Of course i am talking about super mario. It was at the height of the games popularity in the west that we were treated to (and i mean that sincerley) Super Mario Bros the Movie.
Now, if you were to ask someone who was there in the early 90's their thoughts on the plumbers transition to big screen you in all likelihood would be faced with bitter recolections of one of the most misjudged cash in's in the history of game to screen adaptations.This is a film which most believe to have caused so much damage that it put a stop to the idea that there would ever be a decent video game adaptation, and it often appears on 'worst films' lists.
Even Bob Hoskins says it is the biggest mistake of his career.
But i am here to say no, this is not the case.
I still remember the trip to the cinema, it was my cousins birthday. I remember the excitement, this was MARIO! I loved the film then and i love it even more now, heres why.
The look: Criticised as being much darker then its gaming origins, the majority of the film takes place in a beautifuly realised dystopian 'dinopolis' where reptiles have continued to evolve.
We are presented not with the cutsey cartoon world of the various games but with a bladerunner like noirish future. The art direction is fantastic, the city feels alive, it feels organic, from the first time the camera pans over this city scape i am sold, this is real, i can almost smell the fungus....
The Story: Another complaint directed at the film was that it bore little resemblance to the rest of the franchise. I say good. Take a look at the various videogames, as good as they are do you really want that garish cartoon pallet on the screen? Do you really want to see a mario who is heading down the path to 50 chasing around a young girl at least half his age? No of course not, that would be wrong.
And so the filmakers crafted a sci-fi plot involving meteors and paralel dimensions, which at least brought a level of fantastical believability to the consept of a fat catchphrase spouting plumber who saves the world from a giant lizard.
And you know what, it works well, its something new, interesting but it still manages to weave in countless references to the games within the enviroment.
I do not believe the people involved wanted to step all over what had come before. Only that they wanted to try a new approach, to find a new way of bringing the franchise to a wider audience.
Everything Else: All the players are great, Dennis Hopper as Koopa is an inspired piece of casting and Hoskins and liguizamo work well together.
The action is solid, the special effects fantatstic for its time and the script is oftenwitty ("Fascist,opressor of the proletariat!"...."guy in charge")
Cult film?: Most certainly yes, Mark kermode recently said that what defines a cult film is the fact that it was concieved as being a major hit, that the filmakers wanted to create something spectacular but for whatever reason the resulting film did not live up to expectation but overtime built up a small following of loyal fans, and that by concieving something as a cult film (such as the recent pirahna 3d) you are contradicting the very idea of cult, and there-fore can never be cult.
If this is to be believed then SMBTM is the epitome of a cult classic.
As a videogame adaptation: One of the best, granted its not a hard list to top but i just do not understand how people can honestly say this is the worst example in a world where you can buy jcvd's street fighter or Paul w.s andersons mortal kombat/resident evil films. Compared to these this is fucking le dolche vita!
Go back, watch it again. Im telling you even if you dont love it, its a good solid action/adventure sci fi film which i am always happy to watch.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)


